A note to the House Finance Subcommittee Chairs …

APE-Government-Spending-610x406After following and reviewing closely the collective work of the House Finance Subcommittees last week, as finalized and presented early this week to the full House Finance Committee, I sent the following note this morning to the Chairs of the Subcommittees.  The results of their efforts are available here; a  good summary is here.

Wed, Mar 4, 2015 at 8:03 AM

To: Rep.Mark.Neuman@akleg.gov, Rep.Steve.Thompson@akleg.gov, Rep.Dan.Saddler@akleg.gov, Rep.Bryce.Edgmon@akleg.gov, “Rep. Lynn Gattis” <Rep.Lynn.Gattis@akleg.gov>, Rep.Cathy.Munoz@akleg.gov, Rep.Lance.Pruitt@akleg.gov, “Rep. Tammie Wilson” <Rep.Tammie.Wilson@akleg.gov>

Re:  Congratulations for the work of the HFIN Subcommittees

This is to congratulate you collectively as Chairs of the House Finance subcommittees on your work thus far in addressing the current budget situation.

As you are aware, Scott Goldsmith and others at the University of Alaska-Anchorage’s Institute of Social and Economic Research (ISER) have long worked on and advocated a plan to put Alaska’s budgets on a sustainable path, which is fair to both current and future Alaskans and, because of the resulting long-term fiscal stability, would significantly increase Alaska’s attractiveness as a place for long-term investment.  That approach has been endorsed by many who have looked at these issues deeply, including most recently Commonwealth North and the Alaska Chamber.

Earlier this year Dr. Goldsmith updated his work, concluding that the current “sustainable budget” level is $4.5 billion (UGF, operating and capital spending combined).  Recognizing that achieving that level will require significant reductions in the Operating Budget, and as a result, significant changes in the way that state government operates, many who have looked seriously at these issues have concluded that the reductions are best accomplished over three years, with achievable reductions in total UGF spending to $5.5 billion for FY 2016, $5.0 billion for FY 2017 and $4.5 billion by FY 2018.  While a graduated approach results in reductions in the state’s financial nest egg, and thus, a reduction in the sustainable budget level, the approach strikes a reasoned balance against the considerable effort that is required to re-envision parts of state government.

While Governor Walker’s proposed budget came some of the way toward the goal for FY 2016, it did not reach it.  As previously calculated by Legislative Finance, the Governor’s proposed “pre-transfer” UGF budget totals approximately $5.62 Billion.  As I look at the numbers, the work of the subcommittees incorporated into the Committee Substitute appears to have gone the rest of the way in setting a path to accomplish the goal for FY 2016.  When added to the capital budget proposed by the Governor, your efforts have reduced the proposed “pre-transfer” UGF budget to $5.43 Billion.

I appreciate that over the next few days during the full Committee’s deliberations there will be objections, sometimes strenuously articulated, to some of the cuts and that there may be some need to reorder priorities within the overall amount.

The important and hard won collective achievement of the subcommittees should not be lost in the process, however.  Having accomplished the critically important beach head of limiting total FY 2016 UGF spending to less than $5.5 Billion, the full Committee should stay focused on protecting that achievement going forward, both in finalizing the Operating Budget and when addressing the Capital Budget when it comes to the House.

Maintaining FY 2016 spending at no more than $5.5 Billion through the remainder of the legislative process and setting a certain path toward achieving similar reductions in FY 2017 and 2018 in order to reach sustainable levels will require a great deal of additional hard work both in this session and going forward.  In recognition of the moment, however, I wanted to stop and congratulate the subcommittees on achieving an important first step.  Having watched the sessions I know that it required difficult work.  I commend and appreciate you making the efforts it took.


Bradford G. Keithley
​Keithley Consulting, LLC
645 G St., Ste 100, No 796
Anchorage, Alaska 99501

CELL/TXT:   214.675.0038

FAX:           214.279.0692 (efax)
E-MAIL:       bgkeithley@gmail.com
WEB:          http://bgkeithley.com

6 responses to “A note to the House Finance Subcommittee Chairs …

  1. I would not congratulate them. Those are the people that put us into this position in the first place. Since Murk, R spending has been ridiculous, making the efforts of the previous Knowles Admin look like a piker by comparison.
    I am a very conservative R.
    I know of none on those on subcommittees deserving of anything but chastisement. They fed, got fat, and now reality has set in. Wow.
    They are doing their jobs. Wow.
    A shoulder clasp, a look straight into the eye of each and a ‘Do better’ would have been the proper response.
    Larry Wood
    Palmer, Alaska


    • Yep, you and I have disagreed before. We are where we are and got here however we got here. HFIN has done some good work to try to get back on the right path. In my view, they need to be encouraged to keep doing that.


  2. I took pictures of all the business in Anchorage that supported a NO vote on ONE. I no will Boycott them till they make up the difference of State losses or go away. The members of the teachers union could make things right by doing more for less. But there is another group that is shameless at all levels failure.


    • Uh, Will, maybe you aren’t aware that while we are in the hole because of oil prices, we would have been much deeper if we had kept ACES, since it had less downside protection. ACES is also what overtaxed and cost us our production. The overtaxation allowed the high unsustainable budges, and the lack of production has just put us deeper in the hole. More taxes is never the way out of a budget hole like this.


  3. Pingback: The coming week in House Finance … | Thoughts on Alaska Oil & Gas

  4. Pingback: The Alaska budget, the state legislature, percentages and other significant numbers … | Thoughts on Alaska Oil & Gas